Which geopolitical theory argues that control of the Eurasian heartland would enable global domination?

Which geopolitical theory argues that control of the Eurasian heartland would enable global domination?

• A. Heartland Theory
• B. Rimland Theory
• C. Domino Theory
• D. Neo-Malthusians

Answer: (A)

Controlling a large landmass is seen as the route to global power. This item points to the Heartland Theory, which argues that whoever holds the Eurasian heartland—the vast interior of Eurasia—can dominate the world island and, by extension, project power globally. Halford Mackinder framed this as a strategic pivot: land power in this central area can shape affairs across continents, making global domination attainable for those who control it. The Rimland Theory shifts emphasis to the surrounding coastal zones rather than the heartland, the Domino Theory centers on the spread of communism, and Neo-Malthusians focus on population-resource limits, so they don’t fit the claim about controlling the Eurasian heartland leading to global dominance.

Controlling a large landmass is seen as the route to global power. This item points to the Heartland Theory, which argues that whoever holds the Eurasian heartland—the vast interior of Eurasia—can dominate the world island and, by extension, project power globally. Halford Mackinder framed this as a strategic pivot: land power in this central area can shape affairs across continents, making global domination attainable for those who control it. The Rimland Theory shifts emphasis to the surrounding coastal zones rather than the heartland, the Domino Theory centers on the spread of communism, and Neo-Malthusians focus on population-resource limits, so they don’t fit the claim about controlling the Eurasian heartland leading to global dominance.